From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Feb 11, 2020
2020 Ohio 444 (Ohio 2020)

Opinion

No. 2019-0217

02-11-2020

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUMIZEN.


[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-444.] ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Scott Andrew Rumizen, Attorney Registration No. 0058561, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 27, 2019, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, with eighteen months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, 156 Ohio St.3d 575, 2019-Ohio-2519, 130 N.E.3d 283.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and STEWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Feb 11, 2020
2020 Ohio 444 (Ohio 2020)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUMIZEN.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Feb 11, 2020

Citations

2020 Ohio 444 (Ohio 2020)