From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel, v. Malone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 2006
901 A.2d 468 (Pa. 2006)

Summary

In Malone, supra, Malone was arrested as a result of a sting operation conducted by the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office. An agent, posing as a mother of two girls aged seven and nine, made arrangements through the internet to meet Respondent ostensibly to engage in various sexual activities with the three females.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Opinion

No. 953 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

April 25, 2006.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 10, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that Andrew F. Malone be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, retroactive to September 1, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel, v. Malone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 2006
901 A.2d 468 (Pa. 2006)

In Malone, supra, Malone was arrested as a result of a sting operation conducted by the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office. An agent, posing as a mother of two girls aged seven and nine, made arrangements through the internet to meet Respondent ostensibly to engage in various sexual activities with the three females.

Summary of this case from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel, v. Malone

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Andrew F. MALONE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

901 A.2d 468 (Pa. 2006)
587 Pa. 457

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Mitchell also submitted letters from numerous character witnesses. Relying on the five-year suspensions…

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell

Under the circumstances, the Court ordered the respondent suspended for a term of five years retroactive to…