Din
v.
Kerry

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Aug 26, 2015
798 F.3d 1242 (9th Cir. 2015)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Din v. Kerry

    …On remand, the Ninth Circuit affirmed this court's previous judgment dismissing the case in light of the…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 10–16772.

2015-08-26

Fauzia DIN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. John F. KERRY, Secretary of State; Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Homeland Security; Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; Richard Olson, Ambassador of the United States Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan; Christopher Richard, Consul General of the Consular Section at the United States Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan; P. Michael McKinley, Ambassador of the United States Embassy, Kabul, Afghanistan, Defendants–Appellees.

Heidi C. Larson Howell, Sidley Austin LLP, Geoffrey D. Deboskey, Esquire, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Sin Yen Ling, Esquire, Asian Law Caucus, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Ila C. Deiss, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Stacey Ilene Young, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant–Appellee.


Heidi C. Larson Howell, Sidley Austin LLP, Geoffrey D. Deboskey, Esquire, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Sin Yen Ling, Esquire, Asian Law Caucus, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Ila C. Deiss, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Stacey Ilene Young, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant–Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. 3:10–cv–00533–MHP.
Before: RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and RANER C. COLLINS, District Judge.


The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court's opinion in Kerry v. Din, –––U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 2128, 192 L.Ed.2d 183 (2015), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.