Dimeo
v.
Max

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaMay 26, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-1544. (E.D. Pa. May. 26, 2006)

Civil Action No. 06-1544.

May 26, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of defendant's motion to dismiss (docket entry # 2), plaintiff's response and motion to amend (docket entry # 4-5), defendant's reply to the response opposing the motion to dismiss (docket entry # 8), and defendant's response in opposition to the motion to amend (docket entry # 7), and for the reasons enunciated in the accompanying memorandum of law, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The complaint is DISMISSED;

2. The motion to file an amended complaint is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk shall CLOSE this matter statistically.

JUDGEMENT

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2006, the Court having today granted defendant's motion to dismiss and denied plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of defendant Tucker Max and against plaintiff Anthony DiMeo, III.