DiMarco v. Greene

1 Citing brief

  1. The People, Respondent,v.Joseph W. Kislowski, Appellant.

    Brief

    Filed November 17, 2017

    Furthermore, the Courts have examined the nature and circumstances and frequency of the contact (e.g. In Arciniega v. Freeman, 404 U.S. 4 (1971), Page 2 of 12 association was not intended to apply to incidental contact; Birzon v. King, 469 F. 2d 1241 ( 1972), "With regard to the term "associate," we believe that the meaning that would more often occur to men of ordinary intelligence is something more than merely a fleeting or casual acquaintance"; US. v. Albanese, 554 F. 2d 543 ( 1977), association requires more than contact on a casual basis; DiMarco v. Greene, 13 Ohio Misc. 63 (1967), incidental contact, without more, is not sufficient to establish that a person is "associating" with another person. Refer to defendant/appellant's brief at Point III, pg.