From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1997
238 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 7, 1997


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated October 31, 1995, as granted the separate motions of the defendants H.B. Singer, Inc., Automatic Fire Sprinkler Installations, Inc., and the City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-a.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In an action under General Municipal Law § 205-a, it is not necessary to demonstrate the same degree of proximate cause as is required in a common-law negligence action ( see, Jantzen v Edelman of N.Y., 221 A.D.2d 594, 595). Rather, liability is imposed "`"in any case where there is any practical or reasonable connection between a [statutory or code] violation and the injury or death of a fire[fighter]"'" ( Mullen v. Zoebe, Inc., 86 N.Y.2d 135, 140; Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Commn., 85 N.Y.2d 423, 441; McGee v. Adams Paper Twine Co., 26 A.D.2d 186, 195, affd 20 N.Y.2d 921).

Here, it is undisputed that the plaintiff firefighter was injured when the fire hose he was using to extinguish a fire burst, throwing him to the ground. Accordingly, even if, as the plaintiff claimed, the sprinkler system failed to operate, there is no reasonable or practical connection between the plaintiff's injuries and the violation alleged ( see, Patsos v. Suffolk Charles Assoc., 226 A.D.2d 608; Billups v. Wickers, 205 A.D.2d 723; Murphy v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 202 A.D.2d 238; Schwarzrock v Thurcon Dev. Co., 193 A.D.2d 357). Bracken, J.P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dillon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1997
238 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Dillon v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD F. DILLON, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 51

Citing Cases

Williams v. City of New York

The hazard presented by the necessity to transport and detain prisoners was sufficiently and properly…

Downey v. Beatrice Epstein Family Partnership, L.P.

only establish a practical or reasonable connection between the statutory or regulatory violation and the…