Diamond
v.
Bradley

U.S. Supreme CourtMar 9, 1981
450 U.S. 381 (1981)
450 U.S. 381101 S. Ct. 1495

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services

    648 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1981)

    …to In re John A. A., 75 A.D.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319 (1980). The petition for a writ of certiorari was…

  • In re Warmerdam

    33 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

    …3. Citing In re Bradley, 600 F.2d 807, 202 USPQ 480 (CCPA 1979), aff'd, 450 U.S. 381, 101 S.Ct. 1495, 67…

lock 8 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS.

No. 79-855.

Argued October 14, 1980. Decided March 9, 1981.

600 F.2d 807, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Litvack, Harriet S. Shapiro, Robert B. Nicholson, Frederic Freilicher, Joseph F. Nakamura, and Thomas E. Lynch.

Nicholas Prasinos argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Faith F. Driscoll, Henry L. Hanson, and Ronald T. Reiling.

Page 381 Edward S. Irons, Mary Helen Sears, and Robert P. Beshar filed a brief for National Semiconductor Corp. as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Donald R. Dunner, Kenneth E. Kuffner, and Travis Gordon White for the American Patent Law Association, Inc.; by Reed C. Lawlor and James W. Geriak for the Los Angeles Patent Association; and by Morton C. Jacobs for Applied Data Research, Inc., et al.
William James Beard
and John F. Tregoning filed a brief for Halliburton Services as amicus curiae.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.