From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. Bradley

U.S.
Mar 9, 1981
450 U.S. 381 (1981)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS.

No. 79-855.

Argued October 14, 1980. Decided March 9, 1981.

600 F.2d 807, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Litvack, Harriet S. Shapiro, Robert B. Nicholson, Frederic Freilicher, Joseph F. Nakamura, and Thomas E. Lynch.

Nicholas Prasinos argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Faith F. Driscoll, Henry L. Hanson, and Ronald T. Reiling.

Page 381 Edward S. Irons, Mary Helen Sears, and Robert P. Beshar filed a brief for National Semiconductor Corp. as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Donald R. Dunner, Kenneth E. Kuffner, and Travis Gordon White for the American Patent Law Association, Inc.; by Reed C. Lawlor and James W. Geriak for the Los Angeles Patent Association; and by Morton C. Jacobs for Applied Data Research, Inc., et al.
William James Beard and John F. Tregoning filed a brief for Halliburton Services as amicus curiae.


The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Diamond v. Bradley

U.S.
Mar 9, 1981
450 U.S. 381 (1981)
Case details for

Diamond v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v . BRADLEY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 9, 1981

Citations

450 U.S. 381 (1981)
101 S. Ct. 1495

Citing Cases

Arrhythmia Research Technology v. Corazonix

Id. at 592, 98 S.Ct. at 2527, 198 USPQ at 198. As the jurisprudence developed, inventions that were…

In re Abele

Accord, In re Bradley, 600 F.2d 807, 202 USPQ 480 (Cust. Pat.App. 1979), aff'd sub nom by equally divided…