Dedgev.Kendrick

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh CircuitJul 21, 1988
849 F.2d 1398 (11th Cir. 1988)

Cases citing this document

How cited

32 Citing cases

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • holding that a district court properly denied a motion as untimely where the motion was filed after the deadline set forth in the scheduling order and the movant did not request a modification of the scheduling order

    Summary of this case from Gerth v. DeVries

  • holding that a district court properly denied a motion for summary judgment as untimely because the motion was filed after the deadline set in the scheduling order

    Summary of this case from Wye Oak Tech., Inc. v. Republic of Iraq

  • holding that a district court properly denied a motion as untimely where the motion was filed after the deadline set forth in the scheduling order and the movant did not request a modification of the scheduling order

    Summary of this case from Gamez v. United States

No. 87-3870. Non-Argument Calendar.

July 21, 1988.

Julius F. Parker, Jr., Parker, Skelding, McVoy Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Joseph R. Moss, Cocoa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before HILL, VANCE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


The defendant, Steve Kendrick, appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for summary judgment. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(2), the district court is required to enter an order limiting the time to file and hear motions. In this case, the district court entered an order requiring that motions for summary judgment be filed by October 30, 1987. The defendant filed his motion for summary judgment on December 7, 1987. Therefore, the district court properly denied the motion as untimely, and we need not address the merits of the motion in this appeal. See United States Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff, 768 F.2d 1099, 1104 (9th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED.