From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeBolt v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Dec 5, 1934
2 Cal.App.2d 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 9983.

December 5, 1934.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and Thomas C. Gould, Judge thereof, to restore to a bill of exceptions matters stricken therefrom by the trial court. Peremptory writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Charles M. Easton and Palmyra Pressly for Petitioner.

David W. Richards and Henry F. Poyet for Respondents.


[1] One of the defendants in an action which was decided adversely to her seeks by a petition in mandamus to have restored to her bill of exceptions upon appeal matters stricken therefrom by the trial court. Section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the procedure to be taken in such a case.

A peremptory writ denied.

Crail, J., and Scott, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

DeBolt v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Dec 5, 1934
2 Cal.App.2d 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

DeBolt v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL M. DeBOLT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Dec 5, 1934

Citations

2 Cal.App.2d 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
38 P.2d 169