From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Moscow

U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 821 (1992)

Summary

involving dismissal on res judicata grounds

Summary of this case from In re Kmart Corporation

Opinion

No. 91-1899.

October 5, 1992.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 955 F. 2d 807.


Summaries of

Day v. Moscow

U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 821 (1992)

involving dismissal on res judicata grounds

Summary of this case from In re Kmart Corporation

noting that "the alleged distinction between the legal attributes of the unsecured claims is that under state law Phoenix has no recourse against the debtor personally. However, state law is irrelevant where, as here, the Code has eliminated the legal distinction between nonrecourse deficiency claims and other unsecured claims."

Summary of this case from In re JRV Industries, Inc.
Case details for

Day v. Moscow

Case Details

Full title:DAY v. MOSCOW ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 5, 1992

Citations

506 U.S. 821 (1992)

Citing Cases

In re Bernhard Steiner Pianos USA, Inc.

03[4][a] (15th ed. rev. 2000). The Fifth Circuit has taught that, as a general premise, substantially similar…

In re Way Apartments, D.T.

Eleven U.S.C. § 1122(a) governs the classification of creditors. It states, in pertinent part, "a plan may…