From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daon Corp. v. Blankenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 31, 1984
444 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 83-105, 83-182.

January 31, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Dick C.P. Lantz, J.

Talburt, Kubicki Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick Strickroot and Kathleen M. Williams and Michael J. Murphy, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The nature and effect of the order granting the plaintiff's motion for mistrial was to grant a new trial. See A P Bakery Equipment Co. v. H. Hexter Son, Inc., 149 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The trial court's order did not specify the grounds upon which the new trial was granted, as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(f). We therefore relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for the entry of an order stating the reasons for granting the new trial. See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1978); Rodewald v. Lawton, 394 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Daon Corp. v. Blankenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 31, 1984
444 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Daon Corp. v. Blankenstein

Case Details

Full title:DAON CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. RUTH BLANKENSTEIN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 31, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Casines v. State Farm Fla. Ins.

Because the order does not contain specific grounds, we relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for sixty…