Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division ThreeApr 26, 1962
203 Cal.App.2d 6 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc.

    Of course, such orders are not appealable. ( Daar v. Yellow Cab Co., 67 Cal.2d 695, 699 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 724,…

  • Weiss v. Marcus

    An order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not appealable ( Covarrubias v. James (1971) 21…

12 Citing cases

Docket No. 25473.

April 26, 1962.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County sustaining a demurrer to a complaint without leave to amend. Percy C. Heckendorf, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Paul S. Garstang for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese McGee and Daren T. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. [1] That order is not appealable. ( Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [ 252 P.2d 1].) [2] A notice of appeal from such a nonappealable order may be liberally construed as an appeal from the judgment if there is a judgment. ( Evola v. Wendt Construction Co., 158 Cal.App.2d 658 [ 323 P.2d 158]; Smith v. Smith, 126 Cal.App.2d 194 [ 272 P.2d 118]; Crane v. Livingston, 98 Cal.App.2d 699 [ 220 P.2d 744].) [3] The record here contains a document signed by the trial judge entitled "Order Sustaining Demurrer" which orders that "the above action be and the same is hereby dismissed." This document would constitute a judgment if entered in the judgment book, but the record shows no such entry. [4] "In no case is a judgment effectual for any purpose until entered." (Code Civ. Proc., § 664) Prior to entry there is no assurance that the trial judge may not reconsider his decision. ( Phillips v. Phillips, 41 Cal.2d 869, 874 [ 264 P.2d 926]; Adoption of Bird, 183 Cal.App.2d 140, 144 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 675].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P.J., and Ford, J., concurred.