Cogginsv.Astrue

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville DivisionFeb 25, 2011
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:09cv405. (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2011)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Moody v. Asture

    …Garcia v. Commissioner, 2009 WL 2843922 (E.D.Mich. 2009). These facts distinguish this case from those cited…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:09cv405.

February 25, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' cross Motions for Summary Judgment [Docs. 12 and 15], and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 18] regarding the disposition of those motions.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and a specific Order of referral of the district court, the Honorable Dennis L. Howell, United States Magistrate Judge, was designated to consider these pending motions in the above-captioned action and to submit to this Court a recommendation for the disposition of these motions.

On January 28, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 18] in this case containing proposed conclusions of law in support of a recommendation regarding the motions [Docs. 12 and 15]. The parties were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation were to be filed in writing within fourteen (14) days of service. The period within which to file objections has expired, and no written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed.

After a careful review of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 18], the Court finds that the proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be allowed and that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 15] is ALLOWED, and that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: February 25, 2011


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.