In Cluff v. Day, 141 N.Y. 580, 36 N.E. 182, 183, the court said: "There is no iron rule which precludes a court from correcting a manifest error in its former judgment, or which requires it to adhere to an unsound declaration of the law.Summary of this case from Woodward v. Perkins
Argued January 26, 1894
Decided February 6, 1894
Chas. A. Collin for appellants.
Edward B. Whitney for respondent.
ANDREWS, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.