Case No.: 2:21-cv-00011-GMN-DJA
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts, (ECF No. 4), which recommends that the case be dismissed without leave to amend and the Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), be denied as moot.
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). //
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, February 10, 2021, has passed. (See Min. Order, ECF No. 4).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 4), is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), is DENIED as moot.
The Clerk of Court shall close the case.
DATED this 25 day of February, 2021.
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court