From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Rochester v. Bloss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1903
173 N.Y. 646 (N.Y. 1903)

Opinion

Argued February 9, 1903

Decided February 24, 1903

William A. Sutherland for appellant.

Isaac Adler for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN and VANN, JJ. Not voting: O'BRIEN and WERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

City of Rochester v. Bloss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1903
173 N.Y. 646 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for

City of Rochester v. Bloss

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant, v . JOSEPH B. BLOSS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 24, 1903

Citations

173 N.Y. 646 (N.Y. 1903)
66 N.E. 1105

Citing Cases

Laertes Solar, LLC v. Assessor of the Town of Harford

We are unable to discern a contrary intent. To the contrary, the Legislature carved out the ability for…