Opinion
No. 07-74173.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed June 1, 2010.
Chiu Hung Wong, Oakland, CA, pro se.
Kristin Edison, OIL, Katharine Clark, Esquire, Trial, Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A035-341-77.
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Chiu Hung Wong, a native and citizen of Hong Kong, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. The government's renewed motion to remand this petition for review to the BIA is granted over Wong's opposition.
We therefore do not reach the merits of Wong's petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.