From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Dec 29, 2005
1:05-CV-1299-WSD (N.D. Ga. Dec. 29, 2005)

Opinion

1:05-CV-1299-WSD.

December 29, 2005


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Walker [6]. Because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, the Court must conduct a plain error review of the record. United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 (1984). After careful review, the Court finds no plain error in the Magistrate Judge's factual or legal conclusions.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS AS ITS ORDER the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [2] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal-law claims for race discrimination and retaliation and these claims are DISMISSED. Defendant's motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's state-law claims and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chapman v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Dec 29, 2005
1:05-CV-1299-WSD (N.D. Ga. Dec. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Chapman v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK and CO., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

1:05-CV-1299-WSD (N.D. Ga. Dec. 29, 2005)

Citing Cases

Massachusetts Char. Mech. Assoc. v. Beede

A change of trustees, when necessary, is made by judicial decree. Fellows v. Miner, 119 Mass. 541, 545.…

Grimke v. Attorney General

Her prohibition was only of the support of a Roman Catholic institution. We are of opinion that a scheme…