Certiorari Granted — Vacated and Remanded

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
U.S. Supreme CourtJun 28, 2002
536 U.S. 953 (2002)
536 U.S. 953122 S. Ct. 2653

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • State v. Dist. Court for Webster County

    …In Ainsworth v. Risley, 244 F.3d 209 (1st Cir.2001), the court attempted to reconcile potentially…

  • Allen v. U.S.

    …United States v. Allen, 247 F.3d 741, 761-64 (8th Cir. 2001). Allen filed a petition for writ of certiorari…

lock 235 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • holding that a conviction under § 2113(e) for armed robbery in which a killing occurs does not require an additional finding of specific intent to kill, reasoning that the statute is like common law felony murder

    Summary of this case from U.S. v. Mayhew

  • holding that a defendant's strategic stipulation to certain facts of the crime was not the functional equivalent of a guilty plea where the defendant's stipulation did not establish guilt

    Summary of this case from Clark v. State

  • upholding jury's finding of "grave risk of death" statutory aggravating factor because evidence, viewed in light most favorable to government, was sufficient to support finding

    Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ortiz

Analyses written by attorneys

Analyses

2 Analyseskeyboard_arrow_right

JUNE 28, 2002


No. 01-648 AINSWORTH ET AL. v. STANLEY, COMMISISONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of McKune v. Lile, ante, p. 24. Reported below: 244 F.3d 209.

No. 01-797 THOMAS, A MINOR, BY HER FATHER, THOMAS, ET AL. v. ROBERTS ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hope v. Pelzer, ante, p. 730. Reported below: 261 F.3d 1160.

No. 01-1159 VAUGHAN v. COX, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hope v. Pelzer, ante, p. 730. Reported below: 264 F.3d 1027.

No. 01-6798 PERKINS v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Atkins v. Virginia, ante, p. 304. Reported below: 808 So.2d 1143.

No. 01-6821 HARROD v. ARIZONA. Sup.Ct. Ariz. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ring v. Arizona, ante, p. 584. Reported below: 200 Ariz. 309, 26 P.3d 492.

No. 01-7310 ALLEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ring v. Arizona, ante, p. 584. Reported below: 247 F.3d 741.

No. 01-7743 PANDELI v. ARIZONA. Sup.Ct. Ariz. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ring v. Arizona, ante, p. 584. Reported below: 200 Ariz. 365, 26 P.3d 1136.


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.