From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 5, 2001
532 U.S. 907 (2001)

Summary

holding that because there was corroborating evidence, there was no plain error due to the trial court's not charging the jury regarding accomplice testimony

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State

Opinion

MARCH 5, 2001


No. 00-1247. LEJEUNE v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1267. ROGERS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 M.J. 244.

No. 00-1269. ALLEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 M.J. 402.

No. 00-6368. DILLARD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 88.

No. 00-6561. DAVENPORT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 1341.

No. 00-6732. MARTIN v. TAYLOR, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-6980. LEE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 1306.

No. 00-7133. MELSON v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 775 So.2d 904.

No. 00-7167. BAKER v. JONES, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-7255. WHITEHEAD v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 777 So.2d 237.

No. 00-7270. MANNING v. MISSISSIPPI. Sup.Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 765 So.2d 516.

No. 00-7297. KEEN v. TENNESSEE. Sup.Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 S.W.3d 196.

No. 00-7311. HYDE v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 778 So.2d 237.

No. 00-7312. HAMMONDS v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 777 So.2d 777.

No. 00-7391. DAMPER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 592.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 5, 2001
532 U.S. 907 (2001)

holding that because there was corroborating evidence, there was no plain error due to the trial court's not charging the jury regarding accomplice testimony

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State

finding that to relate back under Rule 15(c), the untimely claim must have more in common with the timely filed claim than the mere fact that they arose out of the same trial and sentencing proceedings

Summary of this case from Payne v. U.S.

finding that to relate back under Rule 15(c), the untimely claim must have more in common with the timely filed claim than the mere fact that they arose out of the same trial and sentencing proceedings

Summary of this case from Davis v. McDonough

finding that to relate back under Rule 15(c), the untimely claim must have more in common with the timely filed claim than the mere fact that they arose out of the same trial and sentencing proceedings

Summary of this case from Wendt v. McDonough

finding that to relate back under Rule 15(c), the untimely claim must have more in common with the timely filed claim than the mere fact that they arose out of the same trial and sentencing proceedings

Summary of this case from Brown v. U.S.

rejecting general argument that the death penalty is cruel and unusual

Summary of this case from State v. Freeland
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 5, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 907 (2001)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. State

Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199, 209 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998), aff'd, 778 So.2d 237 (Ala. 2000), cert. denied, 532…

McNabb v. State

Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199, 209 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998), aff'd, 778 So.2d 237 (Ala. 2000), cert. denied, 532…