From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 29, 2001
533 U.S. 963 (2001)

Opinion

JUNE 29, 2001


No. 00-10323. ALVAREZ-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 Fed.Appx. 502.

No. 00-10324. ARELLANO-SANDOVAL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 Fed.Appx. 538.

No. 00-10330. VILLARINO-PACHECO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 746.

No. 00-10332. YUDICE-CAMPOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10345. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 662.

No. 00-10352. MEDRANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 241 F.3d 740.

No. 00-10355. AQUINO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 859.

No. 00-10356. BELL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 5 Fed.Appx. 670.

No. 00-10364. BARTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 642.

No. 00-10367. LAMARRE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 642.

No. 00-10396. ROBBIO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 160.

No. 00-10398. JIMENEZ-MELENDREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 162.

No. 00-10404. MELLERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F.3d 246.

No. 00-1537. CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of Committee on State Taxation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 83 Cal.App.4th 1403, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 509.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 29, 2001
533 U.S. 963 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 29, 2001

Citations

533 U.S. 963 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Sacks

On the other hand, Defendant, in his brief, not only cites toMister and Hayden, but he also draws the Court's…

U.S. v. Pierce

Id. at 1125-26. Pierce's final contention is that the district court erred by applying an upward adjustment…