From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 26, 2001
534 U.S. 1046 (2001)

Summary

holding that gender discrimination claims require a party to show a prima facie showing of intentional discrimination prior to requiring the prosecutor to explain the basis of the challenge and utilizing "the same type of factors which may be relevant in determining whether a Batson violation has occurred"

Summary of this case from State v. Wiggins

Opinion

NOVEMBER 26, 2001


No. 01-6404 ALVARADO v. HAHN, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6405 McBRIDE v. SABOURIN, SUPERINTENDENT, ARTHUR KILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6407 DITTON v. MONTANA COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS. Sup. Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6410 SHEGOG v. BRUNELLE, SUPERINTENDENT, WENDE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6414 DEL CARPIO v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6417 NORDSTROM v. ARIZONA. Sup.Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 Ariz. 229, 25 P.3d 717.

No. 01-6418 PARKER v. HEAD, WARDEN. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 831.

No. 01-6423 JOHNSON v. WARD. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 613.

No. 01-6424 ANDUJAR v. VAUGHN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6427 JEAN-HENRIQUEZ v. MERA ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6431 CALL v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 353 N.C. 400, 545 S.E.2d 190.

No. 01-6439 ROMANO v. GIBSON, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 239 F.3d 1156.

No. 01-6442 BELTON v. MOORE, SUPERINTENDENT, WESTERN MISSOURI CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6443 BATES v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 26, 2001
534 U.S. 1046 (2001)

holding that gender discrimination claims require a party to show a prima facie showing of intentional discrimination prior to requiring the prosecutor to explain the basis of the challenge and utilizing "the same type of factors which may be relevant in determining whether a Batson violation has occurred"

Summary of this case from State v. Wiggins

noting split in circuits regarding whether Remmer's presumption of prejudice rule still applies

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Scull

providing that in order to preserve a question for review, a party must have presented a timely request to the trial court

Summary of this case from State v. Watson
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1046 (2001)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Crosby

" 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1); Henderson v. Campbell, 353 F.3d at 890-91. The statutory presumption of correctness…

Chaney v. Crosby

" 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1); Henderson v. Campbell, 353 F.3d at 890-91. The statutory presumption of correctness…