Cecos Intern., Inc. v. Jorling

2 Citing briefs

  1. Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A.

    REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 33 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint.. Document

    Filed March 21, 2014

    7 Case 1:10-cv-08026-PKC Document 45 Filed 03/21/14 Page 11 of 15 Abstention from the exercise of federal jurisdiction is the narrow exception, not the rule. Cecos Int ‘l, Inc. v. Jorling, 895 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1990). Neither the first or third of the Younger criteria are applicable here.

  2. Gabriel et al v. Fischer et al

    REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 2 Order to Show Cause,,, for a Preliminary Injunction. Document

    Filed April 29, 2008

    A. The Younger Doctrine Does Not Apply Here To justify a refusal to assume jurisdiction on the grounds set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), this Court must conclude that the relief plaintiff seeks will interfere with “ongoing” state court enforcement proceedings. Cecos Int’l, Inc. v. Jorling, 895 F.2d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 1990). “Younger abstention does, in fact, depend on the ‘technicality’ of ongoing judicial proceedings.”