From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 19, 2010
404 F. App'x 143 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-72652.

Submitted November 16, 2010.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 19, 2010.

Debra Jade Mundel, Marks Acalin, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffery R. Leist, Trial, Russell John Verby, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A036-286-656.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Joselito Castro, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.

Castro does not challenge the agency's determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) based on his 1994 conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a).

The BIA correctly determined that Castro is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5). Castro's legal and constitutional challenges to this determination are foreclosed by Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207, 1208 n. 7 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Castro v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 19, 2010
404 F. App'x 143 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Castro v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:Joselito CASTRO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2010

Citations

404 F. App'x 143 (9th Cir. 2010)