From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassidy v. DCFS Trust

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2011
89 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-22

Joseph J. CASSIDY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. DCFS TRUST, Defendant–Appellant,Gilad Realty, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Arnold S. Kronick, White Plains, for appellant. Scott Baron & Associates, P.C., Howard Beach (Michael Szechter of counsel), for respondent.


Arnold S. Kronick, White Plains, for appellant. Scott Baron & Associates, P.C., Howard Beach (Michael Szechter of counsel), for respondent.

TOM, J.P., SAXE, SWEENY, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered January 18, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied that branch of defendants DCFS Trust and Gilad Realty, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against DCFS Trust, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

DCFS Trust, as movant, failed to meet its initial burden to show prima facie entitlement to summary judgment ( see CPLR 3212[b]; Frees v. Frank & Walter Eberhart L.P. No.1, 71 A.D.3d 491, 896 N.Y.S.2d 71 [2010] ), inasmuch as it did not offer competent proof that it was engaged in the business or trade of leasing or renting motor vehicles (including the vehicle driven by the individual defendant), as would entitle it to immunity from vicarious liability for injury caused by the individual defendant ( see 49 USC § 30106 [Graves Amendment]; cf. Ballatore v. HUB Truck Rental Corp., 83 A.D.3d 978, 922 N.Y.S.2d 180 [2011] ). DCFS Trust also failed to present competent proof that the individual defendant was not its employee ( see generally Gogos v. Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., 87 A.D.3d 248, 253, 926 N.Y.S.2d 53 [2011] ). The testimony of the president of defendant Gilad Realty, the company that rented the vehicle from DCFS Trust, is insufficient to establish DCFS Trust's business or trade or its employee roster.


Summaries of

Cassidy v. DCFS Trust

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2011
89 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Cassidy v. DCFS Trust

Case Details

Full title:Joseph J. CASSIDY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. DCFS TRUST…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
933 N.Y.S.2d 31
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8466

Citing Cases

Velasquez v. Famiglietti

Under the Graves Amendment (49 USC § 30106), certain owners of leased or rented motor vehicles are not…

Moore v. Ryder Truck Rental Inc.

However, Defendants have submitted no admissible evidence in support of their motion establishing this fact,…