Carvin
v.
Washington

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISIONDec 20, 2012
Case Number: 2:12-CV-12363 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)

Case Number: 2:12-CV-12363

12-20-2012

JOHN HENRY CARVIN, JR., Plaintiff, v. HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants.


HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (docket no. 14)

AND GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 12)

This matter is before the Court for review of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report") of November 30, 2012. The magistrate judge recommends the Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the case without prejudice.

A copy of the Report was served upon the parties on November 30, 2012. Pursuant to Civil Rule 72(b)(2), each party had fourteen days from that date in which to file any specific written objections to the recommended disposition. Neither party has filed any objections, therefore de novo review of the magistrate judge's finding is not required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (requiring de novo review by a district judge only for "any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to").

Having reviewed the file and the Report, the Court finds that the magistrate judge's analysis is proper. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report's findings and conclusions, and will enter an appropriate judgment.

WHEREFORE it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation of November 30, 2012 (docket no. 14) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

____________________


STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III


United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on December 20, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Carol Cohron


Case Manager