From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caputo v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 29, 2014
987 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-29

In re James P. CAPUTO, Jr., Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., Respondent–Respondent.

Law Offices of John S. Chambers, New York (John S. Chambers of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Hanh H. Le of counsel), for respondent.



Law Offices of John S. Chambers, New York (John S. Chambers of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Hanh H. Le of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, KAPNICK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 30, 2013, denying the petition to annul respondent's determination, dated July 19, 2011, which denied petitioner's application for a premises (residence) handgun license, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent's determination that petitioner's 2001 felony conviction for filing a false instrument in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.35) and misdemeanor conviction for assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00), which stemmed from an incident that occurred in the course of his duties as a police officer and resulted in his dismissal from the police force, demonstrate the lack of good moral character required for a license to own a handgun is not arbitrary and capricious ( seePenal Law § 400.00[1][b]; Matter of Dale v. Safir, 283 A.D.2d 248, 728 N.Y.S.2d 125 [1st Dept.2001];Matter of Hines v. Kelly, 222 A.D.2d 277, 635 N.Y.S.2d 31 [1st Dept.1995],lv. denied87 N.Y.2d 810, 642 N.Y.S.2d 859, 665 N.E.2d 661 [1996] ). Although petitioner's Certificate of Relief from Disabilities removed the automatic bar to licensure occasioned by his prior convictions, it “did not prevent respondent from relying on the convictions in the exercise of his statutory discretion to deny a license for lack of good moral character or good cause” ( Hines v. Kelly, 222 A.D.2d at 277, 635 N.Y.S.2d 31 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see also Matter of Hecht v. Bivona, 306 A.D.2d 410, 761 N.Y.S.2d 485 [2d Dept.2003] ).

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Penal Law's requirement that an applicant for a firearm license be of good moral character passes intermediate constitutional scrutiny in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010), because “[i]t is beyond dispute that preventing the criminal use of firearms is an important government objective; and keeping guns away from people who have shown they cannot be trusted to obey the law is a means substantially related to that end” ( People v. Hughes, 22 N.Y.3d 44, 52, 978 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1 N.E.3d 298 [2013] ).


Summaries of

Caputo v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 29, 2014
987 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Caputo v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In re James P. CAPUTO, Jr., Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 29, 2014

Citations

987 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 644
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3925

Citing Cases

Thomas v. O'Neill

In this case, petitioner gave false testimony about a domestic violence incident, casting doubt on his…

In re Denial of the Application by Winston

Accordingly, even in New York a convicted felon possessing a certificate of relief from disabilities for the…