From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campos v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2016
CASE NO.: 14-cv-1370 JGB(KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 14-cv-1370 JGB(KKx)

11-09-2016

EDDIE CAMPOS, BROOKE CAMPOS, BLAKE CAMPOS, MIKE STEINHAUS and MORGAN BURNINGHAM, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STANELY SNIFF, DANIEL ARENAS, JR, JUVIEN GALZOTE, BRIAN LAUREANO, LISA MILLER, THOMAS MILLER, NILO JOSE, VINCENT MUSARACA, DAVE JOHNSON and GARY GUEVERRA, Defendants, NILO JOSE, Third Party Plaintiff, v. MIKE STEINHAUS, BLAKE CAMPOS and SOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Third Party Defendants

Bruce E. Disenhouse (SBN 078760) Bruce@DisenhouseLaw.net J. Pat Ferraris (SBN 267223) JPat@DisenhouseLaw.net DISENHOUSE LAW APC 3833 Tenth Street Riverside, California 92501 T: 951-530-3710 F: 951-543-4239 Attorneys for Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs NILO JOSE and Defendant JUVIEN GALZOTE


Bruce E. Disenhouse (SBN 078760)
Bruce@DisenhouseLaw.net
J. Pat Ferraris (SBN 267223)
JPat@DisenhouseLaw.net
DISENHOUSE LAW APC
3833 Tenth Street
Riverside, California 92501
T: 951-530-3710
F: 951-543-4239 Attorneys for Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs NILO JOSE and Defendant JUVIEN GALZOTE Honorable Jesus G. Bernal JUDGMENT

This matter came on regularly for trial on September 27, 2016, in Courtroom 1 of the above-entitled court before the Honorable Jesus Bernal, Judge Presiding. Eugene Iredale and Regina Bagdasarian appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs; Bruce E. Disenhouse and J. Pat Ferraris appeared on behalf of Defendants and Third Party Plaintiff.

A jury was duly empaneled and sworn on September 27, 2016. Witnesses were sworn and examined, and documentary evidence was received.

Following instruction and final argument, the jury began its deliberation on October 6, 2016, and duly returned to Court with verdicts the following day, as follows:

VERDICT CONCERNING BLAKE CAMPOS

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did the defendants act under "color of law" againstPlaintiff Blake Campos? Please answer "Yes" or "No" asto each defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 1, please proceed to Question 2 and answer only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 1.

If you answered "no" to all defendants in Question 1, please proceed to Question 4.

Battery claim

Question 4:

Did defendants touch or cause Plaintiff Blake Campos tobe touched with the intent to harm or offend him?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

// If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 4, then answer Question 4a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 4.

If you answered "no" to Question 4 as to all defendants, then skip 4a-4b and answer Question 5.

Assault claim

Question 5:

Did Defendant Nilo Jose and Defendant Juvien Galzoteact, or cause others to act, intending to cause harmfulcontact with Plaintiff Blake Campos or intending to placeBlake Campos in fear of harmful contact? Please answer"Yes" or "No" as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

Intentional infliction of emotional distress claim

Question 6:

Was the conduct of Defendants Nilo Jose and/or JuvienGalzote outrageous? Please answer "Yes" or "No" as toeach Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 6, then answer Question 6a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 6. If you answered "no" to Question 6 as to all defendants, then skip 6a-6c and answer Question 7. // // // // //

False imprisonment claim

Question 7:

Did the Defendants intentionally deprive or cause PlaintiffBlake Campos of his freedom of movement by use ofphysical barriers, force, threats of force, and menace?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 7, then answer Question 7a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 7.

If you answered "no" to Question 7 as to all defendants, please answer Question 8.

Bane Act (Civil Code Section 52.1)

Question 8:

Did the Defendants threaten, intimidate or coerce or causeothers to threaten, intimidate or coerce Plaintiff BlakeCampos? Please answer as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 8, then answer Question 8a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 8.

//

//

//

//

//

//

If you answered "no" to Question 8 as to all defendants, please answer Question 9.

Question 9:

What are Blake Campos' damages?

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR

VERDICT CONCERNING EDDIE CAMPOS

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did the defendants act under "color of law" againstPlaintiff Eddie Campos? Please answer "Yes" or "No" asto each defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 1, please proceed to Question 2 and answer only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 1.

If you answered "no" to all defendants in Question 1, please proceed to Question 4.

Battery claim

Question 4:

Did defendants touch or cause Plaintiff Eddie Campos tobe touched with the intent to harm or offend him?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 4, then answer Question 4a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 4.

If you answered "no" to Question 4 as to all defendants, then skip 4a-4b and answer Question 5.

Assault claim

Question 5:

Did Defendant Nilo Jose and Defendant Juvien Galzoteact, or cause others to act, intending to cause harmfulcontact with Plaintiff Eddie Campos or intending to placeEddie Campos in fear of harmful contact? Please answer"Yes" or "No" as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to Question 5, then answer Question 5a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 5.

If you answered "no," please answer Question 6. // // // //

Intentional infliction of emotional distress claim

Question 6:

Was the conduct of Defendants Nilo Jose and/or JuvienGalzote outrageous? Please answer "Yes" or "No" as toeach Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 6, then answer Question 6a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 6. If you answered "no" to Question 6 as to all defendants, then skip 6a-6c and answer Question 7.

False imprisonment claim

Question 7:

Did the Defendants intentionally deprive or cause PlaintiffEddie Campos of his freedom of movement by use ofphysical barriers, force, threats of force, and menace?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 7, then answer Question 7a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 7.

If you answered "no" to Question 7 as to all defendants, please answer Question 8.

Bane Act (Civil Code Section 52.1)

Question 8:

Did the Defendants threaten, intimidate or coerce or causeothers to threaten, intimidate or coerce Plaintiff EddieCampos? Please answer as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 8, then answer Question 8a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 8.

If you answered "no" to Question 8 as to all defendants, please answer Question 9.

Question 9:

What are Eddie Campos' damages?

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR

VERDICT CONCERNING MORGAN BURNINGHAM

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did the defendants act under "color of law" againstPlaintiff Morgan Burningham? Please answer "Yes" or"No" as to each defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 1, please proceed to Question 2 and answer only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 1.

If you answered "no" to all defendants in Question 1, please proceed to Question 4.

Battery claim

Question 4:

Did defendants touch or cause Plaintiff MorganBurningham to be touched with the intent to harm oroffend him?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 4, then answer Question 4a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 4

If you answered "no" to Question 4 as to all defendants, then skip 4a-4b and answer Question 5.

Assault claim

Question 5:

Did Defendant Nilo Jose and Defendant Juvien Galzoteact, or cause others to act, intending to cause harmfulcontact with Plaintiff Morgan Burningham or intending toplace Morgan Burningham in fear of harmful contact?Please answer "Yes" or "No" as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to Question 5, then answer Question 5a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 5.

If you answered "no," please answer Question 6.

Intentional infliction of emotional distress claim

Question 6:

Was the conduct of Defendants Nilo Jose and/or JuvienGalzote outrageous? Please answer "Yes" or "No" as toeach Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 6, then answer Question 6a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 6. If you answered "no" to Question 6 as to all defendants, then skip 6a-6c and answer Question 7.

False imprisonment claim

Question 7:

Did the Defendants intentionally deprive or cause PlaintiffMorgan Burningham of his freedom of movement by useof physical barriers, force, threats of force, and menace?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 7, then answer Question 7a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 7.

If you answered "no" to Question 7 as to all defendants, please answer Question 8.

Bane Act (Civil Code Section 52.1)

Question 8:

Did the Defendants threaten, intimidate or coerce or causeothers to threaten, intimidate or coerce Plaintiff MorganBurningham? Please answer as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 8, then answer Question 8a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 8.

If you answered "no" to Question 8 as to all defendants, please answer Question 9.

Question 9:

What are Morgan Burningham'damages?

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR

VERDICT CONCERNING MIKE STEINHAUS

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did the defendants act under "color of law" againstPlaintiff Mike Steinhaus? Please answer "Yes" or "No"as to each defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 1, please proceed to Question 2 and answer only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 1.

If you answered "no" to all defendants in Question 1, please proceed to Question 4.

Battery claim

Question 4:

Did defendants touch or cause Plaintiff Mike Steinhaus tobe touched with the intent to harm or offend him?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 4, then answer Question 4a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question.

If you answered "no" to Question 4 as to all defendants, then skip 4a-4b and answer Question 5.

Assault claim

Question 5:

Did Defendant Nilo Jose and Defendant Juvien Galzoteact, or cause others to act, intending to cause harmfulcontact with Plaintiff Mike Steinhaus or intending to placeMike Steinhaus in fear of harmful contact? Please answer"Yes" or "No" as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to Question 5, then answer Question 5a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 5.

If you answered "no," please answer Question 6. // // //

Intentional infliction of emotional distress claim

Question 6:

Was the conduct of Defendants Nilo Jose and/or JuvienGalzote outrageous? Please answer "Yes" or "No" as toeach Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 6, then answer Question 6a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 6. If you answered "no" to Question 6 as to all defendants, then skip 6a-6c and answer Question 7.

False imprisonment claim

Question 7:

Did the Defendants intentionally deprive or cause PlaintiffMike Steinhaus of his freedom of movement by use ofphysical barriers, force, threats of force, and menace?

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 7, then answer Question 7a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 7.

If you answered "no" to Question 7 as to all defendants, please answer Question 8. // // // // //

Bane Act (Civil Code Section 52.1)

Question 8:

Did the Defendants threaten, intimidate or coerce or causeothers to threaten, intimidate or coerce Plaintiff MikeSteinhaus? Please answer as to each Defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 8, then answer Question 8a only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 8.

If you answered "no" to Question 8 as to all defendants, please answer Question 9.

Question 9:

What are Mike Steinhaus' damages?

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR // //

VERDICT CONCERNING BROOKE CAMPOS

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did the defendants act under "color of law" againstPlaintiff Brooke Campos? Please answer "Yes" or "No"as to each defendant.

Answer:

Nilo Jose: ___ Yes X No

Juvien Galzote: ___ Yes X No

If you answered "yes" to any defendant in Question 1, please proceed to Question 2 and answer only with regard to the defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" in Question 1.

If you answered "no" to all defendants in Question 1, please proceed to Question 4.

Question 4:

What are Brooke Campos'damages?

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00__________

Stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR // //

VERDICT CONCERNING THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF

NILO JOSE

We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find unanimously as follows:

Question 1:

Did Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos touch Nilo Josewith the intent to harm or offend him? Please answer"yes" or "no" for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes X No

Blake Campos: ___ X Yes No

If you answered "yes" for either third party defendant, then answer Question 1a only with regard to the third party defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" to Question 1.

If you answered "no" to Question 1 for both third party defendants, skip to Question 2.

Question 1a:

Did Nilo Jose consent to be touched by Mike Steinhausand/or Blake Campos? Please answer "yes" or "no" foreach third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: ___ Yes X No

If you answer "no" to Question 1a for either third party defendant, then answer Question 1b as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "no" to Question 1a.

If you answered "yes" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 2.

Question 1b:

Was Nilo Jose harmed or offended by the touching?Please answer "yes" or "no" for each third partydefendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answered "yes" to Question 1b for either third party defendant, answer Question 1c as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "yes" to Question 1b.

If you answered "no" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 2.

Question 1c:

Would a reasonable person in Nilo Jose's position havebeen offended by the touching? Please answer "yes" or"no" for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

Answer Question 2.

Question 2:

Did Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos act intending tocause harmful or offensive contact with Nilo Jose, orintending to place Nilo Jose in fear of harmful or offensivecontact? Please answer "yes" or "no" for each third partydefendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes X No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answered "yes" for either third party defendant, then answer Question 2a only with regard to the third party defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" to Question 2.

If you answered "no" to Question 2 for both third party defendants, skip to Question 3. // // // // //

Question 2a:

Did Nilo Jose reasonably believe he was about to betouched in a harmful or offensive manner? Please answer"yes" or "no" for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answer "no" to Question 2a for either third party defendant, then answer Question 2b as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "no" to Question 2a.

If you answered "yes" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 3.

Question 2b:

Did Nilo Jose consent to the contact? Please answer "ye"or "no" for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: ___ Yes X No

If you answer "no" to Question 2b for either third party defendant, then answer Question 2c as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "no" in Question 2b.

If you answered "yes" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 3.

Question 2c:

Was the touching in a harmful or offensive manner asubstantial factor in causing harm to Nilo Jose? Pleaseanswer "yes" or "no" for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

Answer Question 3.

//

//

Question 3:

Was the conduct of Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Camposoutrageous? Please answer "yes" or "no" for each thirdparty defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes X No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answered "yes" for either third party defendant, then answer Question 3a only with regard to the third party defendant(s) as to whom you answered "yes" to Question 3.

If you answered "no" to Question 3 for both third party defendants, skip to Question 4.

Question 3a:

Did Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos intend to causeNilo Jose emotional distress or did they act with recklessdisregard of the probability that he would suffer emotionaldistress? Please answer "yes" or "no" for each third partydefendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes X No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answered "no" to Question 3a for either third party defendant, then answer Question 3b as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "no" to Question 3a.

If you answered "yes" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 4.

Question 3b:

Did Nilo Jose suffer severe emotional distress as a resultof the conduct of Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos?Please answer "yes" or "no" for each third partydefendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answer "no" to Question 3b for either third party defendant, then answer Question 3c as to the third party defendant for whom you answered "no" to Question 3b.

If you answered "yes" for both third party defendants, skip to Question 4.

Question 3b:

Was the conduct of Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake asubstantial factor in causing Niles Jose's severe emotionaldistress? Please answer yes or no for each third partydefendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

Answer Question 4.

Civil Code section 52.1

Question 4:

Did Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos threaten,intimidate or coerce Niles Jose? Please answer yes or nofor each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answered "yes for either third party defendant, then answer question 4a only with regard to the third party defendant(s) as to whom you answered yes to question 4.

If you answered "no to question for both third party defendants, skip to question 5. // // // //

Question 4a:

Did Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Campos commit theseacts of threat, intimidation or coercion to prevent NilesJose from exercising his right to protest the conduct ofMike Steinhaus, Blake Campos and their party? Pleaseanswer yes or no for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

If you answer no to question 4a for either third party defendant, then answer question 4b as to the third party defendant for whom you answered no to question 4a.

If you answered yes for both third party defendants, skip to question 5.

Question 4b:

Was the conduct of Mike Steinhaus and/or Blake Camposa substantial factor in causing harm to Niles Jose? Pleaseanswer yes or no for each third party defendant.

Answer:

Mike Steinhaus: ___ Yes ___ No

Blake Campos: X Yes ___ No

Answer question 5.

Answer question 5 only if you answered "yes" to one or more of the following questions: 1c, 2c, 3b or 4b.

What are Niles Jose's damges:

Past noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$21,812.62

Future noneconomic loss, includingphysical pain and mental suffering:

$0.00

// //

Have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Date: October 7, 2016

/s/ Linda Haynes

PRESIDING JUROR

WHEREFORE, BY REASON OF THE AFORESAID, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs EDDIE CAMPOS, BROOKE CAMPOS, BLAKE CAMPOS, MIKE STEINHAUS and MORGAN BURNINGHAM shall take nothing by reason of their Complaint on file herein, that Defendants NILO JOSE and JUVIEN GALZOTE shall have judgment against Plaintiffs, that the Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, and Defendants shall be entitled to their statutory costs of suit pursuant to a timely filed Bill of Costs pursuant to FRCP Rule 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Third Party Plaintiff NILO JOSE shall have and recover the sum of$21,812.62 from Third Party Defendant BLAKE CAMPOS, plus statutory costs of suit, pursuant to FRCP Rule 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54. Third Party Plaintiff NILO JOSE shall take nothing by reason of this Third Party Complaint against Third Party Defendant MICHAEL STEINHAUS, and the Third Party Complaint shall be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to MICHAEL STEINHAUS.

On April 18, 2016, this court granted the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S Motion for Summary Judgment as against all plaintiffs.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs shall take nothing by reason of their complaint against the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, that judgment shall be entered in favor of the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and against Plaintiffs, the complaint shall be ordered dismissed with prejudice as against the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE shall be entitled to its statutory costs of suit pursuant to FRCP Rule 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54. Date: November 9, 2016

/s/_________

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Campos v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2016
CASE NO.: 14-cv-1370 JGB(KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Campos v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE CAMPOS, BROOKE CAMPOS, BLAKE CAMPOS, MIKE STEINHAUS and MORGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: 14-cv-1370 JGB(KKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2016)