From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 27, 2023
2:23-cv-973-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-973-SPC-KCD

11-27-2023

REMOI CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL JUDGE

Before the Court are Petitioner Remoi Campbell's Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. 8) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9). The Court dismissed Campbell's habeas petition because it did not state any habeas claims, and because Campbell did not exhaust post-conviction remedies in state court. Both of Campbell's one-page motions express general disagreement with the dismissal.

Campbell's motions explicitly request compensation, attorney fees, appointment of counsel, and a “more definite statement.” These requests are frivolous-Campbell does not state any conceivable ground for entitlement to those remedies. To the extent Campbell seeks reconsideration of the dismissal, that implied request also lacks merit. Reconsideration of a prior order is an extraordinary measure that should be applied sparingly. Adams v. Beoneman, 335 F.R.D. 452, 454 (M.D. Fla. 2020). Campbell does not state any valid ground for reconsideration. Accordingly, Campbell's motions (Docs. 8 and 9) are denied.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 27, 2023
2:23-cv-973-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Campbell v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:REMOI CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Nov 27, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-973-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2023)