From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. American Basketball Assn

U.S.
Jul 1, 1996
518 U.S. 1033 (1996)

Summary

holding that "consideration of race or ethnicity by the [University of Texas] law school for the purposes of achieving a diverse student body is not a compelling interest under the Fourteenth Amendment."

Summary of this case from Eisenberg v. Montgomery County Public Schools

Opinion

No. 95-1012.

July 1, 1996.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 66 F. 3d 523.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. American Basketball Assn

U.S.
Jul 1, 1996
518 U.S. 1033 (1996)

holding that "consideration of race or ethnicity by the [University of Texas] law school for the purposes of achieving a diverse student body is not a compelling interest under the Fourteenth Amendment."

Summary of this case from Eisenberg v. Montgomery County Public Schools

finding that the state's interest in diversity at a law school was not compelling and declaring that school's admissions policy, which employed racial classifications, unconstitutional

Summary of this case from Wessmann by Wessmann v. Boston Sch. Comm.

dismissing state law claims that arguably constituted unfair labor practice because deciding those claims would have required determination of whether state law relied upon was consistent with substantive provisions of federal law and fashioning of remedy, both of which are exclusive responsibilities of National Labor Relations Board

Summary of this case from Barbieri v. United Technologies Corp.
Case details for

Caldwell v. American Basketball Assn

Case Details

Full title:CALDWELL v. AMERICAN BASKETBALL ASSN., INC., ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

518 U.S. 1033 (1996)

Citing Cases

Worthy v. Collagen Corp.

Lakie v. SmithKline Beecham, 965 F. Supp. 49, 54 (D.D.C. 1997) ("The fact that the PMA process requires…

Lesage v. State of Texas

Francois Daniel Lesage applied to enroll in a doctoral program in counseling psychology at The University of…