From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cakebread v. Berkeley Millwork & Furniture Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-00083-RS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-00083-RS

09-20-2016

STEVE CAKEBREAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BERKELEY MILLWORK AND FURNITURE CO., INC., Defendant.


ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

In light of the discovery dispute pending before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is continued without prejudice. The Court refrains from addressing Defendant's request for deferral under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56(d) at this time. Once Magistrate Judge Ryu has resolved the parties' dispute, Plaintiffs may place their motion back on calendar and the parties may file supplemental briefs based on new discovery, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2016

/s/_________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cakebread v. Berkeley Millwork & Furniture Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-00083-RS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Cakebread v. Berkeley Millwork & Furniture Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEVE CAKEBREAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BERKELEY MILLWORK AND FURNITURE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-00083-RS (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)