From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 31, 1996
451 Mich. 909 (Mich. 1996)

Summary

finding that child pornography "is a form of sexual abuse which can result in physical or psychological harm, or both, to the children involved."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Frabizio

Opinion

No. 104208.

May 31, 1996.


Leave to Appeal Denied May 31, 1996:

Court of Appeals No. 171364.


Summaries of

Burns v. Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 31, 1996
451 Mich. 909 (Mich. 1996)

finding that child pornography "is a form of sexual abuse which can result in physical or psychological harm, or both, to the children involved."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Frabizio

finding a strong link between pedophilic behavior and child pornography

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hersh

amending § 1326 to add first reference to deportation orders

Summary of this case from United States v. Guzman-Velasquez

setting out Congressional finding that “the creation or distribution of child pornography which includes an image of a recognizable minor invades the child's privacy and reputational interests, since images that are created showing a child's face or other identifiable feature on a body engaging in sexually explicit conduct can haunt the minor for years to come”

Summary of this case from United States v. Klug

blocking 1997 COLA

Summary of this case from Beer v. United States

creating a right of action for terrorism-related injuries against an "official, employee, or agent of a foreign state designated as a state sponsor of terrorism"

Summary of this case from Rux ex rel. I.M.O. v. Republic of the Sudan

replacing § 212(c) with 8 U.S.C. § 1229b

Summary of this case from Singh v. Keisler

repealing § 1817(b)(D)

Summary of this case from America's Community Bankers v. Federal Deposit Insurance

setting out what is currently codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1103(b)

Summary of this case from United States v. 1.16 Acres of Land

repealing Section 212(c) in its entirety as of September 30, 1996

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Ashcroft

noting deferred adjudication falls within the specific definition of "conviction" in the federal deportation provision

Summary of this case from Cuellar v. State
Case details for

Burns v. Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn

Case Details

Full title:BURNS v. HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ COHN

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 31, 1996

Citations

451 Mich. 909 (Mich. 1996)

Citing Cases

United States v. 1.16 Acres of Land

IIRIRA gave the Attorney General the authority to acquire interests in land "adjacent to or in the vicinity…

United States v. Sevilla

However, in March of 1997 there was no analogue to 8 U.S.C. § 1229, which provides the statutory definition…