From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. United States Department of Justice

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 7, 1977
559 F.2d 1182 (10th Cir. 1977)

Summary

affirming ruling that pro se litigants are not eligible for attorneys' fees under FOIA

Summary of this case from Cheavens v. Pub. Serv. Corp. of Colo.

Opinion

No. 76-2046.

June 7, 1977.

Leonard Schaitman, Mark H. Gallant, Attys., Appellate Section, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James P. Buchele, U.S. Atty., Mary K. Briscoe, Asst. U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for respondents-appellees.

Robert T. Burke, pro se.

Before SETH and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PICKETT, Senior Circuit Judge.


While administrative proceedings were still pending before the Department of Justice, appellant Burke filed suit pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking to compel release of copies of photographs which were introduced into evidence at his criminal trial. The Department of Justice ultimately determined while the instant proceedings were still pending that the photographs would be released upon payment of search and reproduction costs. Burke then requested that the district court order release of the documents without payment of these fees and that he be furnished $300.00 in attorney fees even though he was proceeding pro se. The district court, 432 F. Supp. 251, ordered that the government pay the costs of the suit but denied Burke's requests that he be furnished attorney fees and that the government be ordered to furnish the photographs without payment of the fees.

After carefully reviewing the files and records in this case we are in full agreement with the analysis and conclusions of the district court as expressed in its orders filed September 13, 1976 and September 27, 1976. The judgment of the district court is accordingly affirmed.

The Clerk of this Court shall certify a copy of this order to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas as and for the mandate.


Summaries of

Burke v. United States Department of Justice

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 7, 1977
559 F.2d 1182 (10th Cir. 1977)

affirming ruling that pro se litigants are not eligible for attorneys' fees under FOIA

Summary of this case from Cheavens v. Pub. Serv. Corp. of Colo.
Case details for

Burke v. United States Department of Justice

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT T. BURKE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 1977

Citations

559 F.2d 1182 (10th Cir. 1977)

Citing Cases

Donahue v. Thomas

pe of the Supreme Court's holding in Kay, supra, as being that "§ 1988 does not permit an award of attorney's…

DeBold v. Stimson

We conclude that a non-attorney pro se litigant is not entitled to an award of attorney fees under FOIA. The…