From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Civil Service Commission of Bremerton

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Nov 2, 1987
49 Wn. App. 1057 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Brown v. Bremerton, 69 Wn. 474, 125 P. 785, we said: "It is familiar law that parol testimony is admissible to show the circumstances under which a deed was made."

Summary of this case from Standring v. Mooney

Opinion

No. 8816-9-II.

November 2, 1987. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 84-2-00490-0, William E. Howard, J., entered April 30, 1985.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Callow, J. Pro Tem., concurred in by Petrich, J., and Edgerton, J. Pro Tem.


Summaries of

Brown v. Civil Service Commission of Bremerton

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Nov 2, 1987
49 Wn. App. 1057 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

In Brown v. Bremerton, 69 Wn. 474, 125 P. 785, we said: "It is familiar law that parol testimony is admissible to show the circumstances under which a deed was made."

Summary of this case from Standring v. Mooney
Case details for

Brown v. Civil Service Commission of Bremerton

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BROWN, Appellant, v. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF BREMERTON…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Nov 2, 1987

Citations

49 Wn. App. 1057 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)
49 Wash. App. 1057

Citing Cases

Standring v. Mooney

We have approved and applied this rule. In Brown v. Bremerton, 69 Wn. 474, 125 P. 785, we said: "It is…

Roxana Petroleum Corporation v. Corn

When the language of a deed is ambiguous, resort may be had to the surrounding circumstances existing at the…