From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Browder v. Nehad

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2020
141 S. Ct. 235 (2020)

Summary

noting that courts review “the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor”

Summary of this case from Cherewick v. State Farm Fire & Cas.

Opinion

No. 19-1067.

10-05-2020

Neal N. BROWDER, et al., Petitioners, v. S.R. NEHAD, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Browder v. Nehad

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2020
141 S. Ct. 235 (2020)

noting that courts review “the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor”

Summary of this case from Cherewick v. State Farm Fire & Cas.

noting that courts review "the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor"

Summary of this case from United States v. Goldsmith
Case details for

Browder v. Nehad

Case Details

Full title:Neal N. BROWDER, et al., Petitioners, v. S.R. NEHAD, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Oct 5, 2020

Citations

141 S. Ct. 235 (2020)
208 L. Ed. 2d 14

Citing Cases

United States v. Goldsmith

For purposes of ruling on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the Court liberally construes all…

Totton v. City of Sacramento

In determining whether an officer's actions were objectively reasonable, the Court “must balance the nature…