FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Steven D. Brooks ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on August 14, 2013.
On June 16, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed for failure to obey a court order.
The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2014
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE