From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Binford

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Sep 10, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv597-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 10, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv597-TMH.

September 10, 2008


ORDER


On August 7, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that:

1. The § 1983 claims presented against Defendant Binford are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I) and (iii);
2. To the extent plaintiff's complaint presents a challenge to the constitutionality of his current confinement, such claim is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii).


Summaries of

Brooks v. Binford

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Sep 10, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv597-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Brooks v. Binford

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY TERRELL BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. HENRY D. (BUTCH) BINFORD, CIRCUIT…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 10, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv597-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 10, 2008)