From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broder v. Amhurst Fabrics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 1951
279 App. Div. 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Summary

In Broder v. Amhurst Fabrics (supra), the Appellate Term again, in its memorandum opinion, referred to a cause of action for rescission and so described the case and said: "Plaintiff on the law and the facts failed to prove a cause of action for rescission".

Summary of this case from Berg Inc. v. Associated Spinners Inc.

Opinion

October 16, 1951.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.


Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, on the ground that under all the facts and circumstances disclosed, plaintiff buyer did not give notice of election to rescind within a reasonable time after he knew or ought to have known of the claimed breach.


Summaries of

Broder v. Amhurst Fabrics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 1951
279 App. Div. 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

In Broder v. Amhurst Fabrics (supra), the Appellate Term again, in its memorandum opinion, referred to a cause of action for rescission and so described the case and said: "Plaintiff on the law and the facts failed to prove a cause of action for rescission".

Summary of this case from Berg Inc. v. Associated Spinners Inc.
Case details for

Broder v. Amhurst Fabrics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS BRODER, Appellant, v. AMHURST FABRICS, INC., Respondent and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

BERG INC. v. Associated Spinners Inc.

Actions for money had and received are founded on equitable principles, but they are of course, actions at…

Berg Inc. v. Associated Spinners Inc.

( Roberts v. Ely, 113 N.Y. 128; Schank v. Schuchman, 212 N.Y. 352.) I have thought it necessary to write at…