Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.v.S.C.

Supreme Court of CaliforniaNov 19, 2014
337 P.3d 1158 (Cal. 2014)
337 P.3d 1158180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 99

No. S221038.

2014-11-19

BRISTOL–MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY v. S.C. (Anderson).


Prior report: 228 Cal.App.4th 605, 175 Cal.Rptr.3d 412

Applications to appear as counsel pro hac vice granted. The applications of Anand Agneshwar, Roberta “Lea” Brilmayer, Daniel Pariser, Steven G. Reade and Anna Thompson for admission pro hac vice to appear on behalf of Bristol–Myers Squibb Company are granted. The petition for review is granted and the parties are directed to address: (1) whether after Daimler AG v. Bauman (2014) 571 U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 746, 187 L.Ed.2d 624, general jurisdiction exists; and (2) whether specific jurisdiction exists. CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, CORRIGAN, and LIU, JJ., concur.