From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 15, 1994

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Davis, JJ.


Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, J.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, complaint reinstated, cross motion granted and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that the non-compete covenant set forth in his employment agreement with defendant All Seasons Services, Inc. (All Seasons) was invalid and unenforceable. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment declaring that covenant valid and enforceable and permanently enjoining plaintiff from competing with All Seasons until termination of the covenant. We reverse.

It is well established that restrictive covenants that tend to prevent an employee from pursuing a similar vocation upon termination or retirement from employment are disfavored by the law (see, Columbia Ribbon Carbon Mfg. Co. v. A-1-A Corp., 42 N.Y.2d 496, 499; Accent Stripe v. Taylor, 204 A.D.2d 1054; Pezrow Corp. v. Seifert, 197 A.D.2d 856, lv dismissed 83 N.Y.2d 798; Comcast Sound Communications v. Hoeltke, 174 A.D.2d 1023, lv dismissed 79 N.Y.2d 915; Buffalo Imprints v. Scinta, 144 A.D.2d 1025, 1026; Newco Waste Sys. v. Swartzenberg, 125 A.D.2d 1004). Such covenants will not be enforced unless necessary to protect trade secrets, confidential customer lists or good will, or to prevent special harm to which the former employer might be exposed because of the unique nature of the employee's services (see, American Broadcasting Cos. v. Wolf, 52 N.Y.2d 394, 403; Accent Stripe v. Taylor, supra; Pezrow Corp. v. Seifert, supra, at 856-857). All Seasons did not dispute that the identity of potential customers for vending services could be obtained through the yellow pages of the telephone book, and it conceded that its price structure varies with the preferences and needs of each customer. Under the circumstances, All Seasons failed to establish that its customer list or price structure policy and contracts constitute a trade secret (see, Columbia Ribbon Carbon Mfg. Co. v. A-1-A Corp., supra, at 499; Buffalo Imprints v. Scinta, supra, at 1027). The fact that plaintiff was a knowledgeable and experienced sales representative does not establish that his skills were unique or that he was irreplaceable (see, Pezrow Corp. v. Seifert, supra; Comcast Sound Communications v. Hoeltke, supra, at 1024).

Plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted declaring that the restrictive covenant, or non-compete provision, is invalid and unenforceable.


Summaries of

Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 15, 1994
206 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN BRISKIN, Appellant, v. ALL SEASONS SERVICES, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 166

Citing Cases

Video Projects Co. v. N.Y. Racing Assoc

We affirm. In opposition to the prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…

Savannah Bank v. Savings Bank, Fingerlakes

"[R]estrictive covenants contained in employment contracts that tend to prevent an employee from pursuing a…