From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brenan v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1953
282 App. Div. 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

December 15, 1953.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.


Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. As a general rule the examination of a defendant in a tort action for personal injuries or death should proceed after the conclusion of defendant's examination of plaintiff. (Cf. Fahrney v. Eller, 278 App. Div. 635. ) The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Brenan v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1953
282 App. Div. 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Brenan v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE BRENAN, Appellant, v. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, INC., Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Zaulich v. Thompkins Square Co.

In order to establish a violation of section 200 there must be notice, actual or constructive, of the…

Stephenson v. Air Products Chemicals, Inc.

That the application of the rule to factual situations is sometimes difficult is apparent from an examination…