Braverman
v.
Mexico

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICOApr 30, 2013
No. CIV 11-0829 JB/LFG (D.N.M. Apr. 30, 2013)

No. CIV 11-0829 JB/LFG

04-30-2013

KATE BRAVERMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO, SARAH SINGLETON, and JAMES HALL, Defendants.

Parties and Counsel: Kate Braverman Santa Fe, New Mexico Plaintiff pro se Gary K. King New Mexico Attorney General Scott Fuqua Assistant State Attorney State Attorney General's Office Santa Fe, New Mexico Attorneys for Defendants State of New Mexico, Sarah Singleton, and James Hall Richard S. Lees Richard S. Lees, P.A. Santa Fe, New Mexico Attorney for Intervenor Defendant Alan Goldstein


FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on its Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal, filed April 30, 2013 (Doc. 50), in which the Court dismissed Plaintiff Kate Braverman's First Amended Complaint, filed November 7, 2011 (Doc. 21). See Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal at 3. Because the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal disposes of all parties and issues before the Court, the Court now enters final judgment in this matter.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Kate Braverman's claims and case are dismissed, and final judgment is entered.

/s/_________


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Parties and Counsel:

Kate Braverman
Santa Fe, New Mexico

Plaintiff pro se Gary K. King


New Mexico Attorney General
Scott Fuqua


Assistant State Attorney
State Attorney General's Office
Santa Fe, New Mexico

Attorneys for Defendants State of New Mexico, Sarah Singleton, and James Hall Richard S. Lees
Richard S. Lees, P.A.
Santa Fe, New Mexico

Attorney for Intervenor Defendant Alan Goldstein