Bras v. California Public Utilities Commission

2 Citing briefs

  1. Jewel et al v. National Security Agency et al

    Memorandum in Opposition re Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

    Filed September 29, 2014

    But on summary judgment, parties must establish the facts necessary to their claims “with the manner and degree of evidence required at the successive stages of the litigation.” Bras, 59 F.3d at 872. The proffered evidence that Mr. Klein’s inadmissible allegations are “plausible,” and so could be true, falls far short of the mark.

  2. In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

    Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint

    Filed September 28, 2007

    Id. (citing Bras v. California Pub. Util. Comm’n, 59 F.3d 869, 873 (9th Cir. 1995)); see also City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 101-02 (1983). Even a cursory examination of Plaintiffs’ proposed Supplemental Complaint demonstrates that, at most, Plaintiffs’ allegations of injury are based on the theory that their communications might be intercepted under the authority granted by the PAA.