From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brady v. Miller

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 15, 2014
No. 65127 (Nev. Sep. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65127

09-15-2014

GINA BRADY, Appellant, v. LORRAINE MILLER, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a short trial judge order awarding attorney fees, costs, and interest in a negligence action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Blair C. Parker, Judge.

On July 25, 2014, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, pointing out that the district court had not signed the short trial judge's proposed order. See NSTR 3(d)(4) (providing that pro tempore short trial judges' proposed orders are not effective until signed by the district court). We cautioned appellant that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction might result in this court's dismissal of this appeal. Appellant's response was due by August 25, 2014. To date, however, appellant has not responded or otherwise demonstrated jurisdiction. Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Blair C. Parker, Short Trial Judge

Nathaniel J. Reed, Settlement Judge

Law Office of David Sampson

Upson Smith/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Brady v. Miller

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 15, 2014
No. 65127 (Nev. Sep. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Brady v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:GINA BRADY, Appellant, v. LORRAINE MILLER, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 15, 2014

Citations

No. 65127 (Nev. Sep. 15, 2014)