From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Internal Revenue Service

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00167-MCE-GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-00167-MCE-GGH PS.

September 8, 2010


ORDER


On July 29, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 29, 2010, are ADOPTED; and

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, filed October 15, 2009 (docket #16), is granted, and this action is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

Dated: September 7, 2010


Summaries of

Bowman v. Internal Revenue Service

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-00167-MCE-GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Bowman v. Internal Revenue Service

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO ISIDORY BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 8, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-00167-MCE-GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Reilly v. United States

(Compl., Ex. A) Defendant contends that, as to Patty Reilly, the doctor's statement is deficient because the…