Court of Appeals of the State of New YorkJul 6, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 982 (N.Y. 1976)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Tillery v. Lynn

    Although punitive damages now may be awarded in New York in the absence of a showing of a fraud on the…

  • Seitzman v. Hudson River Associates

    The court explained further: "The complaint is deemed to demand punitive damages, which are recoverable only…

119 Citing cases

Argued June 8, 1976

Decided July 6, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ABRAHAM J. MULTER, J.

Alex V. Myslicki, Jr., for appellant.

Robert A. Straniere for respondents.

MEMORANDUM. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs.

It is not essential, as the Appellate Division stated, that punitive damages be allowed in a fraud case only where the acts had been aimed at the public generally. Nevertheless, the proof in this case does not establish such gross, wanton, or willful fraud or other morally culpable conduct to a degree sufficient to justify an award of punitive damages. At least the Appellate Division was entitled to so conclude. (See, generally, Walker v Sheldon, 10 N.Y.2d 401, 404-405.)

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.