From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beutel v. Beutel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 957 (N.Y. 1982)

Summary

holding plaintiff ratified agreement where plaintiff was competent for "two years during which the contract was effective and fully performed"

Summary of this case from Aretakis v. Caesars Entm't

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1982

Decided February 16, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, OLIVER C. SUTTON, J.

Marvin H. Mitchelson, Roy M. Cohn, John A. Kiser and Louis Biancone for appellant.

Alan M. Gelb and Shepard A. Federgreen for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Plaintiff's pleading and the papers submitted in its support cannot be said to set forth a legal basis for finding that defendant procured the separation agreement by duress. As alleged in the complaint, plaintiff was under emotional strain during the several months that the agreement was being drafted. During this entire period, however, plaintiff was represented by an attorney who undertook the actual negotiations. Implicitly, plaintiff's attorney also approved the terms of the agreement and there is no contrary showing. Plaintiff signed the agreement at her attorney's office, in her attorney's presence, and several days before defendant signed the agreement at his attorney's office. Even accepting plaintiff's allegation that defendant persistently telephoned her to urge that she sign the agreement, the circumstances described in the complaint do not constitute duress.

Nor does the complaint state a cause of action to rescind on the ground of incapacity to contract. Even if the complaint could be read to allege incapacity, nothing in the complaint or the affidavits suggests that plaintiff's claimed incapacity continued through the two years during which the contract was effective and fully performed by defendant, and the benefits received by plaintiff. Under such circumstances, plaintiff must be deemed to have ratified the agreement (cf. Sternlieb v Normandie Nat. Securities Corp., 263 N.Y. 245, 247-248; Smith v Ryan, 191 N.Y. 452, 458; Soviero Bros. Contr. Corp. v City of New York, 286 App. Div. 435, affd 2 N.Y.2d 924).

In light of the disposition of the appeal on the ground of the insufficiency of the pleadings, no opinion is expressed as to the other issues raised by the parties.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur; Judge JONES taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Beutel v. Beutel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 957 (N.Y. 1982)

holding plaintiff ratified agreement where plaintiff was competent for "two years during which the contract was effective and fully performed"

Summary of this case from Aretakis v. Caesars Entm't

In Beutel (55 NY2d at 958), ratification blocked plaintiff's rescission claim grounded on lack of capacity because the claim did not include allegations that his incapacity continued for the two years before suit was brought, during which time he had accepted the benefits of the contract.

Summary of this case from In re Schleifer
Case details for

Beutel v. Beutel

Case Details

Full title:LYNN D. BEUTEL, Appellant, v. WILLIAM C. BEUTEL, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1982

Citations

55 N.Y.2d 957 (N.Y. 1982)
449 N.Y.S.2d 180
434 N.E.2d 249

Citing Cases

Surlak v. Surlak

ome the heavy presumption that a deliberately prepared and executed written instrument manifested the true…

Stacom v. Wunsch

Accordingly, plaintiff has effectively ratified the separation agreement. (See, Beutel v. Beutel, 55 N.Y.2d…