From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beard v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jan 6, 2012
Case No. 3:11-CV-03.780-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-CV-03.780-CRB

01-06-2012

ANDRE BEARD and GLORIBEL GUERRERO, On Behalf Of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a California Corporation, d/b/a AT&T California; and DOES 1-20, inclusive Defendants.

Nancy Hersh, Esq. Mark E. Burton, Jr., Esq. Charles C. Kelly, II, Esq. Matthew D. Carlson, Esq. Hersh & Hersh Attorneys for Plaintiffs Andre Beard and Gloribel Guerrero, On Behalf Of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated Arthur C. Chambers, Esq. Ilona Brusil, Esq. Joong Y. Im, Esq. Of Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiffs Andre Beard and Gloribel Guerrero, On Behalf Of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated


[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Civ. L.R. 6-1]


Current Response Date: January 9, 2012

New Response Date: January 26, 2012

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY'S deadline within which to answer or otherwise serve and file any motions or other pleadings responsive to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint in this action is hereby extended from January 9, 2012 to and including January 26, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Judge Charlers R. Breyer

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Debra A. Jackson, state:

My business address is 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor, Irvine, CA 92614. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action.

On the date set forth below, I served the foregoing document(s) described as:

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
on the following person(s) in this action:
Please see attached service list
[x] BY FIRST CLASS MAIL: I am employed in the City and County of Orange where the mailing occurred. I enclosed the document(s) identified above in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the person(s) listed above, with postage fully paid. I placed the envelope or package for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on January 4, 2012, at Irvine, California.

_______________

Debra A. Jackson

SERVICE LIST

Andre Beard v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, et al.

United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division


Case No. CGC-11-510715

Nancy Hersh, Esq.

Mark E. Burton, Jr., Esq.

Charles C. Kelly, II, Esq.

Matthew D. Carlson, Esq.

Hersh & Hersh

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Andre Beard and Gloribel Guerrero, On Behalf Of

Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated

Arthur C. Chambers, Esq.

Ilona Brusil, Esq.

Joong Y. Im, Esq.

Of Counsel

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Andre Beard and Gloribel Guerrero, On Behalf Of

Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated


Summaries of

Beard v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jan 6, 2012
Case No. 3:11-CV-03.780-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Beard v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE BEARD and GLORIBEL GUERRERO, On Behalf Of Themselves And All Others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-CV-03.780-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)