Bartel
v.
John Crane Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. OhioMay 3, 2004
316 F. Supp. 2d 603 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

Cases citing this case

How cited

lock 16 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • finding Dr. Frank's single fiber theory to be inconsistent with prevailing scientific evidence, including the testimony of Drs. Lemen and Hammar

    Summary of this case from In re Asbestos Litig.

  • finding Dr. Frank's single fiber theory to be inconsistent with prevailing scientific evidence, including the testimony of Drs. Lemen and Hammar

    Summary of this case from In re Asbestos Litigation

  • finding Dr. Frank's single fiber theory to be inconsistent with prevailing scientific evidence, including the testimony of Drs. Lemen and Hammar

    Summary of this case from In re Asbestos Litigation

Analyses written by attorneys

Analyses

1 Analysiskeyboard_arrow_right

CASE NO. 1:98 CV 13222

May 3, 2004


JUDGMENT ENTRY


In accordance with Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court files its Post Trial Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Verdict contemporaneously herewith, and enters a verdict in favor of defendant, John Crane. It is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned case is hereby terminated and dismissed as final.

IT IS SO ORDERED.