From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbagallo v. Americana Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 26, 1969
254 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1969)


Argued October 27, 1969

Decided November 26, 1969

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, CHARLES A. LORETO, J.

Benjamin H. Siff and Peter E. DeBlasio for respondent-appellant.

Robert E. Curran, Ronald D. Rose and Kevin D. Moloney for appellant.

Robert G. Sheller and Edgar L. Sheller for respondent.

MEMORANDUM. The exclusion of the telephone conversations was error because they were relevant to establishing the duration and depth of defendant's alleged fear. The truth of their contents was not the purpose of defendant's offer. ( Ferrara v. Galluchio, 5 N.Y.2d 16, 19-20; Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.], § 211.) It cannot be concluded that, as a matter of law, the jury would not have been influenced by the additional details in assessing defendant's alleged fear of injury to himself or his family. The request as to the effect of the failure of plaintiff's wife to testify was improper in form and, therefore, was properly denied ( Seligson, Morris Neuburger v. Fairbanks Whitney Corp., 22 A.D.2d 625, 629-631).

Judges BURKE, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON concur in memorandum; Chief Judge FULD and Judge SCILEPPI dissent in part and vote to affirm as to both defendants on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Order modified to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Thierer and directing a new trial, with costs to abide the event, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant Americana Corp., in a memorandum.

Summaries of

Barbagallo v. Americana Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 26, 1969
254 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1969)
Case details for

Barbagallo v. Americana Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BARBAGALLO, Respondent-Appellant, v. AMERICANA CORP., Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 26, 1969


254 N.E.2d 768 (N.Y. 1969)
254 N.E.2d 768
306 N.Y.S.2d 466

Citing Cases

Disalvo v. Bortle

The court erred in excluding as hearsay certain testimony of Katherine Gruber, a passenger in decedent's…

Platovsky v. City of New York

The defendants were also denied the opportunity to present rebuttal testimony from an expert witness to the…